Monday, July 20, 2009

Movie Review- "Harry Potter 6"



I'm going to level with you. I've only seen the Harry Potter movies. I'm not one of those obsesssed fan who starts reading the novels the second they buy it, and then lose sleep trying to finish it. So, for thos eof you dear readers who happen to find themselves to be that type of fan, my review will probably be very simplistic to you. Even still, feel free to comment.

Overall, I found this film to be decent. However, I felt that there was much more that could have been done with it. I know this is the problem with trying to translate a long, detail-filled novel with a rabid fanbase into a film that must have appeal for the masses.

But, let's start with the good. Some of the kids are really finding themselves as actors. As such, their performances are getting increasingly better. This is,I believe, especially true of Daniel Radcliffe, who plays Harry himself.

The problem with the film is this: It's not the "darkest one yet". It's all teenage crushes and love stories. Was the director trying to make this a "Twilighted" version of Harry Potter? I will say that romance movies are not generaly my cup of green tea. We've been lead on this cinematic journey to believe thatthere's this coming ultimate showdown between good and evil. Suddenly, we need a romantic interlude? Also, I thought the battle in the bathroom between Harry and Draco could have been more substantial. And where was the funeral for Dumbledore? (I was told there was one in the book.)

I am waiting for the director's cut on DVD. There has to be more than just this.

This film left me with a few questions:
1. Why call it "...and the Half-Blood Prince" if that's a minor detail in the movie?
2. Where does Tim Burton end and Helena Bonham Carter begin? (They're married in real life)
3. Why is Dumbledore so "touchy-feely" all of a sudden?

The discussion factor is actually decent here. The most obvious one is the discussion over how much the film differed from the book (I'm told). Other discussions which may stem from this film are the nature of trust, divine plans and purpose, as well as the limits of academic freedom and pursuit. The "that guy" factor is not really that high as well, with the regular cast of Hogwarts faculty doing that particular duty. The new addition here is Jim Broadbent as Professor Horace Slughorn. Broadbent, of course doing his part of filling the role which calls for "Old British gent without a cool, deep voice."

Acting: B
Directing: C-
That Guy: B
Overall B-

1 comment:

Battra13 said...

I can answer all of those questions for you, but it would take me about a decade.

I'll leave you with this one:

The Half Blood Prince in the book was far more substantial. Harry trying to figure out who it was, and such. Using his potions book to get a phenomenal grade in Slughorn's class, etc.

Also...the draco/harry bathroom scene yeah that was about right.